EAT Redundancy : Collective Consultation and Information – Suitable alternative employment
The Tribunal did not err in law in concluding that the Respondent dismissed the Claimant fairly, notwithstanding that it did not inform him of or interview him for a new post of HR director. Polkey v AE Dayton Services Ltd [1988] AC 344 and Duffy v Yeomans and Partners [1995] ICR 1 considered and applied.
Judges:
David Richardson J
Citations:
[2012] UKEAT 0114 – 12 – 1809
Links:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Employment
Updated: 06 November 2022; Ref: scu.465813