The Lord Chancellor repudiated an argument that the publication of letters should be restrained, because their publication would be painful to the feelings of the Plaintiff; and said, ‘The question will be, whether the bill has stated facts of which the Court can take notice, as a case of civil property, which it is bound to protect.’
Citations:
[1818] EngR 605, (1818) 2 Swans 402, (1818) 36 ER 670
Links:
Cited by:
Cited – Prince Albert v Strange ChD 8-Feb-1849
The Prince sought to restrain publication of otherwise unpublished private etchings and lists of works by Queen Victoria. The etchings appeared to have been removed surreptitiously from or by one Brown. A personal confidence was claimed.
Held: . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Intellectual Property
Updated: 02 May 2022; Ref: scu.332605