Anami Holdings and Another v Gill: ChD 6 Oct 2014

The claimants alleged that Mr Gill had, in effect, defrauded them of some andpound;8 million, and a freezing order was obtained on an application without notice in the autumn of 2011. Within a month or so, that freezing order had been discharged. On learning that a later judgment in different proceedings had gone in favour of the defendant, the claimant had then obtained an order charging the proceeds of that judgment. That claim had been settled on agreed terms, but the claimant now sought further orders under that settlement.

Judges:

David Richards J

Citations:

[2014] EWHC 3800 (Ch)

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Torts – Other

Updated: 07 April 2022; Ref: scu.539773