The parties disputed sums said to be due under arrangements selling medical malpractice insurance in Italy.
Held: ATEL had a ‘good arguable case’ that the ToBA continued as an agreement and was not superseded by the ‘Framework Agreement’, and that the courts of England and Wales have jurisdiction in relation to disputes arising out of that agreement.
Judges:
Blair J
Citations:
[2014] EWHC 4169 (Comm)
Links:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Cited by:
Appeal from – Trust Risk Group Spa v AmTrust Europe Ltd CA 30-Apr-2015
The appeal was as to a jurisdiction dispute arising from the breakdown of a business relationship about the placement of medical malpractice insurance in the Italian market. The underlying question was whether the contractual arrangements between . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Contract, Jurisdiction, Insurance
Updated: 29 March 2022; Ref: scu.539959