‘In this case it is not in dispute that an employee of the Defendant, Rhully Begum, breached the rights of the Claimant by accessing and disclosing to the Claimant’s husband information about the Claimant (and also the two young children of the family) which was stored on the Defendant’s IT system. The issue is whether the Defendant is vicariously liable for Ms Begum’s admittedly wrongful, and indeed criminal, acts.’
Judges:
Richard Spearman QC
(Sitting as a Judge of the Queens Bench Division)
Citations:
[2022] EWHC 132 (QB)
Links:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Vicarious Liability
Updated: 31 March 2022; Ref: scu.671640