Alfred Willame v Commission of the EAEC (Judgment): ECJ 13 Jul 1966

Europa 1. Procedure – interpretation of a judgment – allegation of the existence of ambiguity or obscurity – admissibility of an application for interpretation (statute of the court of justice of the EAEC, article 41) 2. Procedure – interpretation of a judgment – detailed rules (statute of the court of justice of the EAEC, article 41) 1. The question whether the judgment to be interpreted is or is not ambiguous or obscure appertains to the examination of the substance of the application. So far as admissibility is concerned, it is enough that the applicant alleges the existence of an ambiguity or of obscurity. 2. In order to decide whether the operative part of a judgment is or is not ambiguous or obscure, it should be read together with the applicant’s conclusions and the statement of the grounds of the said judgment.

Citations:

C-110/63

European

Updated: 10 April 2022; Ref: scu.131729