The decision maker had taken into account all relevant and material considerations and had come to a conclusion which could not be said to have been unreasonable in all the circumstances, including the circumstance that the petitioner had already had essentially the same claim entertained and rejected by two separate adjudicators. The court rejected a challenge to a refusal by the Tribunal to extend the time limit.
Judges:
Rafferty J
Citations:
[2002] EWHC 2182 (Admin)
Links:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Cited by:
Distinguished – Mohammadi v Advocate General Scotland HCJ 2-May-2003
The applicant had claimed asylum. His claim had been rejected and an order made for repatriation to Iran. His appeal was lodged two days out of time. He appealed its rejection. The solicitors accepted full responsibility for the delay.
Held: . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Immigration
Updated: 10 July 2022; Ref: scu.178010