The ET was entitled to find that the Claimant was validly dismissed by reason of redundancy, and its reasons adequately explained its decision. Its rejection of the evidence of one potential witness was justified in the circumstances of the case and its failure to mention evidence of a relatively peripheral nature from another witness did not amount to an error of law.
Citations:
[2020] UKEAT 0115 – 19 – 1903
Links:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Employment
Updated: 04 November 2022; Ref: scu.649252