AES UST-Kamenogorsk Hydropower Plant Llp v UST-Kamenogorsk Hydropower Plant Jsc: CA 27 May 2011

The parties disputed the right to prevent a foreign court action where the agreement required arbitration in London

Judges:

Rix, Wilson, Stanley-Burnton LJJ

Citations:

[2011] EWCA Civ 647

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

Appeal from – AES Ust-Kamenogorsk Hydropower Plant Llp v Ust-Kamenogorsk Hydropower Plant Jsc ComC 16-Apr-2010
The parties contracte for works relating to a power plant. The applicable law was Khazak, but the agreement provided that any dispute between the parties was to be settled by arbitration in London. The claimant now sought an anti-suit injunction to . .

Cited by:

Appeal from – UST-Kamenogorsk Hydropower Plant Jsc v AES UST-Kamenogorsk Hydropower Plant Llp SC 12-Jun-2013
Arrangements between the parties owners and operators of a power plant in Kazakhstan required disputes to be arbitrated in London under ICC Rules. That clause was governed by English law, and the remainder by Kazakh law. A ruling by the Supreme . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Arbitration

Updated: 13 September 2022; Ref: scu.440214