In the course of a child residence and contact dispute, M made allegations against F of abuse against the child C. The allegations were investigated and substantially rejected. M passed private court materials to the press. F obtained an injunction against her, but she withdrew from the proceedings. F now sought an injunction against the media.
Held: The injunction should be granted. The court’s inherent jurisdiction to protect the well being of C. Though materials may be in the public domain, repetitions could still be hurtful and damaging to C. The need for the freedom of speech was to be balanced against the paramount importance given to C’s interests. In this case that balance was in favour of the injunction.
Charles J
[2000] 1 FLR 562
England and Wales
Cited by:
Cited – Kelly (A Minor) v British Broadcasting Corporation FD 25-Jul-2000
K, aged 16, had left home to join what was said to be a religious sect. His whereabouts were unknown. He had been made a ward of court and the Official Solicitor was appointed to represent his interests. He had sent messages to say that he was well . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Media, Children
Updated: 12 December 2021; Ref: scu.445475
