Click the case name for better results:

Gridquest Ltd T/A Select Employment, Piper Group Plc, XR Associates Ltd v K A Blackburn etc: CA 23 Jul 2002

The employer and employees disagreed about whether an element of holiday pay had been included in the rate of pay. Held: There had to be an explicit agreement between the parties before this could happen. It was not for one side unilaterally to impose its own understanding of the contract. The regulations referred to ‘contractual’ … Continue reading Gridquest Ltd T/A Select Employment, Piper Group Plc, XR Associates Ltd v K A Blackburn etc: CA 23 Jul 2002

Gridquest Ltd T/A Select Employment, Piper Group Plc, XR Associates Ltd v Blackburn etc: EAT 1 Nov 2000

The respondents appealed a finding that they were not due to make additional holiday pay under the regulations. The employer asserted that the hourly rate of pay included a rolled up element of holiday and sick pay. The employee asserted that the contract documentation made no mention of such an arrangement. The employers claimed that … Continue reading Gridquest Ltd T/A Select Employment, Piper Group Plc, XR Associates Ltd v Blackburn etc: EAT 1 Nov 2000

Marshalls Clay Products Ltd Pearce Clarke, Sutton, Hoy v Caulfield and others, Huw Howatson Ltd Frank Studdon Ltd, Potting Constuction Ltd, Hanlin Construction: EAT 25 Jun 2003

Conjoined appeals were considered on the issue of whether holiday pay arrangements met the requirements of the Working Time Regulations, where holiday pay was in some was rolled up with normal pay. Held: Five categories were identified. Those were silent as to holiday pay; contracts excluding entitlement; contracts where holiday pay was included within standard … Continue reading Marshalls Clay Products Ltd Pearce Clarke, Sutton, Hoy v Caulfield and others, Huw Howatson Ltd Frank Studdon Ltd, Potting Constuction Ltd, Hanlin Construction: EAT 25 Jun 2003

Robinson-Steele v RD Retail Services Ltd; Clarke v Frank Staddon Ltd and similar: ECJ 16 Mar 2006

The employers used a system of ‘rolled up’ holiday pay, so that staff received a sum equivalent to holiday pay throughout the year. Held: Such a system was not in accordance with the Working Time Directive. The directive required that there should be a specific payment for a particular period during which a worker took … Continue reading Robinson-Steele v RD Retail Services Ltd; Clarke v Frank Staddon Ltd and similar: ECJ 16 Mar 2006

Bowden and Others v Tuffnells Parcels Express Ltd: ECJ 4 Oct 2001

The provisions of the Directive, which excluded from regulation the employment of transport workers, applied to office workers as well as to actual drivers. The phrases used by the Directive in disapplying the Directive to certain employment sectors, made a distinction between those employed in certain industries, and, in other cases, those with certain jobs. … Continue reading Bowden and Others v Tuffnells Parcels Express Ltd: ECJ 4 Oct 2001

Voteforce Associates Ltd v K Quinn: EAT 30 Jul 2001

The applicant had worked as a waitress for the company, working as they requested, and also at her own option. She claimed the right to paid leave under the working time regulations. The tribunal found that she had been continuously employed for 13 weeks. The regulations required that the relationship be governed by a contract … Continue reading Voteforce Associates Ltd v K Quinn: EAT 30 Jul 2001