Click the case name for better results:

Regina v Dealy: CACD 13 Dec 1994

Evasion of VAT does not require proof of intent to permanently deprive, ‘evasion’ can consist in a deferment, rather than permanent evasion, of a liability. Citations: Times 13-Dec-1994, [1995] STC 217 Statutes: Value Added Tax Act 1983 39(1) Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: Cited – Zen Internet Ltd v Customs and Excise VDT 5-Apr-2004 … Continue reading Regina v Dealy: CACD 13 Dec 1994

Hewcastle Catering Ltd v Ahmed and Elkamah: CA 1991

The employers devised a VAT evasion scheme depending in part on the co-operation of the employees, but the employees themselves received no benefit. After giving evidence against their employers, the plaintiffs were dismissed. The employer appealed a finding of unfair dismissal, saying the employees were to be prevented from relying upon their unlawful agreement. Held: … Continue reading Hewcastle Catering Ltd v Ahmed and Elkamah: CA 1991