Click the case name for better results:

Lucky Technology Limited v Revenue and Customs (VAT : Face-Value Vouchers): FTTTx 22 Sep 2022

Value Added Tax Act 1994. Value Added Tax Regulations 1995. Face-value vouchers, redeemable on the online games platform ‘Steam’, owned by Valve Corporation. Vouchers sold to appellant by a concession run by DSG Retail Limited within Harrods Limited. Whether single purpose vouchers within the meaning of paragraph 7A of Schedule 10 to the Value Added … Continue reading Lucky Technology Limited v Revenue and Customs (VAT : Face-Value Vouchers): FTTTx 22 Sep 2022

Eastern Atlantic Helicopters Ltd v Revenue and Customs (Vat – Input Tax : Other): FTTTx 22 Apr 2016

FTTTx VAT – Input tax – Sale of helicopter held in name of US entity on trust for civil aviation regulatory purposes to UK appellant – identity of supplier?- whether supply by UK company which provided invoice or by US legal owner trustee – supplier was the UK company which held beneficial interest – appeal … Continue reading Eastern Atlantic Helicopters Ltd v Revenue and Customs (Vat – Input Tax : Other): FTTTx 22 Apr 2016

GB Housley Ltd v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 15 Feb 2013

FTTTX VAT – Self-billing – failure to complete a self-billing agreement – HMRC aware of self-billing from various visits over many years – 4 traders deregistered – self-billing regulation 29(2) of VAT Regulations 1995 not apply – no – HMRC failed to consider discretion – appeal allowed. Citations: [2013] UKFTT 150 (TC) Links: Bailii Statutes: … Continue reading GB Housley Ltd v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 15 Feb 2013

Revenue and Customs v GB Housley Ltd; UTTC 10 Jul 2014

References: [2014] UKUT 320 (TCC) Links: Bailii Coram: Warren J P UTTC VAT-Self-billing- failure to complete a self-billing agreement- 4 traders deregistered – whether discretion under regulation 29(2) of VAT Regulations 1995 properly exercised – No – whether assessment to be discharged- Adjourned for further argument Statutes: VAT Regulations 1995 29(2)

McAndrew Utilities Ltd v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 4 Dec 2012

FTTTx VALUE ADDED TAX – input tax – section 24 VATA 1994 – regulation 29(2) VAT Regulations 1995 – whether there were taxable supplies by taxable persons – whether the appellant in possession of valid VAT invoices to support its input tax claim – discretion as to alternative evidence of the charge to VAT – … Continue reading McAndrew Utilities Ltd v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 4 Dec 2012

Best Buys Supplies Ltd v The Commissionmers for Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 6 Jul 2010

VAT – Whether HMRC were unreasonable in the exercise of their discretion not to allow claims for input tax in absence of valid tax invoices – Yes – Whether the decision to refuse claims for input tax have been the same had HMRC acted reasonably – Yes – Appeal dismissed – Regulation 29(2) VAT Regulations … Continue reading Best Buys Supplies Ltd v The Commissionmers for Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 6 Jul 2010

Plazadome Ltd v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 4 Sep 2009

Value Added Tax – Whether supply made – Deduction of input tax – Whether invoices identify goods – s.14(1)(g) VAT Regs 1995 – No – Whether discretion exercised under VAT Regulations 1995, Regulation 29(2) – Section not engaged – Whether reasons for decision can be varied – Yes – Appeal dismissed Citations: [2009] UKFTT 229 … Continue reading Plazadome Ltd v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 4 Sep 2009

Maliha Group Ltd v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 16 Dec 2010

VAT – input tax – disallowance – whether there had actually been any supply of services to which the relevant VAT invoices related – held in part no, and to that extent the input VAT should be disallowed – whether the remaining input VAT should be disallowed for failure to provide other evidence of the … Continue reading Maliha Group Ltd v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 16 Dec 2010

AXA General Insurance Ltd and Others v Lord Advocate and Others: SC 12 Oct 2011

Standing to Claim under A1P1 ECHR The appellants had written employers’ liability insurance policies. They appealed against rejection of their challenge to the 2009 Act which provided that asymptomatic pleural plaques, pleural thickening and asbestosis should constitute actionable harm for the purposes of an action of damages for personal injury. Held: The insurers’ appeals failed. … Continue reading AXA General Insurance Ltd and Others v Lord Advocate and Others: SC 12 Oct 2011