Click the case name for better results:

Mobilicity (Trade Mark: Opposition) O-367-04: IPO 14 Dec 2004

IPO Section 3(6): – Opposition failed. Section 5(2)(b): – Opposition failed. Section 5(3): – Opposition failed. Section 5(4)(a): – Opposition failed. 1. Admission of additional evidence. 2. Admission of ‘without prejudice’ evidence. 3. Bad faith; Section 32(3) not to be used as ‘a form of revocation prior to registration’. 4. Comparison of the marks MOBIL … Continue reading Mobilicity (Trade Mark: Opposition) O-367-04: IPO 14 Dec 2004

Mobilicity (Trade Mark: Opposition) O-368-04: IPO 14 Dec 2004

1. Statement of grounds of opposition : scope of the attack. 2. Amendment of pleadings; inherent jurisdiction to allow. In dealing with the opposition to this application (see BL O/367/04) the Hearing Officer questioned the scope of the objections under Section 5(2)(b), giving as his view that the pleadings did not include an attack on … Continue reading Mobilicity (Trade Mark: Opposition) O-368-04: IPO 14 Dec 2004