UTLC BLIGHT NOTICE – maisonette – blighted land – appropriate authority’s intention not to acquire any part of hereditament – reasonable endeavours to sell – unable to sell unless at substantially reduced price – claimant’s failure to comply with prescribed form – objections not upheld – blight notice valid – Town and Country Planning Act … Continue reading Head v Eastbourne Borough Council: UTLC 22 Dec 2009
BLIGHT NOTICE – land protected from development by proposals for a relief road – whether blight notice and counter-notice valid and if counter-notice valid, whether that objection to blight notice well founded – determined blight notice and counter-notice valid but counter- notice not well founded – Town and Country Planning Act 1990 sections 150(1)(b) and … Continue reading Gennard v Bridgnorth District Council: LT 19 Nov 2004
UTLC BLIGHT NOTICE – business premises – alleged blighted land – claimant’s failure to comply with prescribed form – reasonable endeavours to sell – failure to sell – counter notice – appropriate authority’s intention not to acquire any part of land due to proposed cancellation of prospective scheme – claimants’ objections not upheld – blight … Continue reading Harris v The Highways Agency: UTLC 6 Feb 2012
Compensation – Blight Notice – preliminary issue – whether blighted land – detached bungalow said by claimants to be blighted by proposed A5 by-pass – whether identified for the purposes of a relevant public function in a development plan document – Town and Country Planning Act 1990 section 151(4)(a) Citations: [2020] UKUT 276 (LC) Links: … Continue reading McEvoy and Another v Warwickshire County Council: UTLC 26 Oct 2020
BLIGHT NOTICE – Hinkley Point C Connection Project – rights acquired over garden and out building of house in rural location – existing pylons to be removed – new pylons and underground high voltage cables to be installed – whether property blighted . .
COMPENSATION – BLIGHT NOTICE – material date for consideration of appropriate authority’s objection – whether appropriate authority’s additional words by way of an ‘informative’ to statutory ground of objection made his counter-notice invalid – . .
