Click the case name for better results:

Steibelt v Paling: ChD 28 Apr 1999

Revenue’s appeal from allowance of claim for rollover relief Citations: [1999] EWHC 845 (Ch), [1999] BTC 184, [1999] STC 594, 71 TC 376 Links: Bailii Statutes: Taxation of Chargeable Gains Act 1992 152 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Capital Gains Tax Updated: 27 June 2022; Ref: scu.341197

Steibelt (Inspector of Taxes) v Paling: CA 19 May 1999

Where the Board of Inland Revenue had refused to extend the time limit to allow re-investment of funds realised, it was not open to the General Commissioners to overrule that decision on appeal. Citations: Times 19-May-1999, Gazette 19-May-1999 Statutes: Taxation of Chargeable Gains Act 1992 152 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Capital Gains Tax Updated: 11 … Continue reading Steibelt (Inspector of Taxes) v Paling: CA 19 May 1999

Moore v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 14 Aug 2013

FTTTx CAPITAL GAINS TAX – disposal of a residential property after 8 months of occupation – whether the property had been the appellant’s residence – whether his occupation of the property had the necessary degree of permanence, continuity or expectation of continuity – held on the evidence that it did not – sections 222 and … Continue reading Moore v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 14 Aug 2013

Hamar v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 28 Oct 2011

FTTTx Capital Gains Tax – Gift of property – CGT not paid by donor – Subsequent assessment on donee under s 282 Taxation of Chargeable Gains Act 1992 -Whether subsequent assessment for correct year – No – Appeal allowed Citations: [2011] UKFTT 687 (TC) Links: Bailii Statutes: Taxation of Chargeable Gains Act 1992 282 Jurisdiction: … Continue reading Hamar v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 28 Oct 2011

Wardhaugh (Inspector of Taxes) v Penrith Rugby Union Football Club: ChD 10 May 2002

The taxpayer had accepted a grant toward the building of a new club house. They sought rollover relief on the proceeds of sale of the former club house. The inspector sought to restrict the claim to exclude the benefit of the grant. Held: The grant was not to be taken into account. Section 50 did … Continue reading Wardhaugh (Inspector of Taxes) v Penrith Rugby Union Football Club: ChD 10 May 2002