Click the case name for better results:

Acts

1267 – 1278 – 1285 – 1297 – 1361 – 1449 – 1491 – 1533 – 1677 – 1688 – 1689 – 1700 – 1706 – 1710 – 1730 – 1737 – 1738 – 1751 – 1774 – 1792 – 1793 – 1804 – 1814 – 1819 – 1824 – 1828 – 1831 – 1832 … Continue reading Acts

Dacre Son and Hartley Ltd v North Yorkshire Trading Standards: Admn 27 Oct 2004

The defendants appealed a conviction under the Act complaining of the adequacy of the evidence presented. A buyer had found dampness in a property. It was later remarketed by the defendant who asked if it suffered dampness. She was told it did not. Held: ‘the informations each described the specific offence charged in ordinary language … Continue reading Dacre Son and Hartley Ltd v North Yorkshire Trading Standards: Admn 27 Oct 2004

Lewin (Trading Standards Officer) v Barratt Homes Ltd: QBD 1 Dec 1999

New houses were advertised for sale. Pictures of the house were available, with some disclaimers as to minor variations, but the houses actually built had greater deviation. The builder claimed the statements were not descriptions of existing properties, but they knew they could not build the houses as described. Held: The case was remitted to … Continue reading Lewin (Trading Standards Officer) v Barratt Homes Ltd: QBD 1 Dec 1999

Lancashire County Council v Buchanan: Admn 7 Nov 2007

The defendant estate agent was prosecuted for misdescribing the ability of his client to convey good title to the land offered. The seller did not initially have a registered possessory title to part of the land.
Held: The agent’s appeal . .