LT COLLECTIVE ENFRANCHISEMENT – Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 section 33 – costs of enfranchisement – procedural defect in LVT reducing costs claimed by reversioner by reference to a matter which was not in dispute between the parties. Citations: [2007] EWLands LRA – 184 – 2006 Links: Bailii Statutes: Leasehold Reform, Housing … Continue reading Stoll Construction Ltd v Colclough and others: LT 4 Jul 2007
UTLC LEASEHOLD ENFRANCHISEMENT – costs – whether freeholder can recover costs of managing agent in addition to those of solicitors and valuers in dealing with an enfranchisement notice – appeal allowed – First Tier Tribunal wrongly disallowed managing agents costs on the grounds the work could have been done by the freeholder without considering reasonableness … Continue reading Columbia House Properties (No3) Ltd v Imperial Hall Freehold Ltd: UTLC 3 Feb 2015
‘This case concerns the proper interpretation of certain provisions of that [1993 Act] regime when after a claim to collective enfranchisement has been made and registered, the freeholder grants a 999 year lease of a part of the premises. In a thorough and thoughtful judgment in the Central London County Court, HH Judge Marshall QC … Continue reading Cadogan v Panagopoulos and Another: ChD 15 Mar 2010
Determination of costs to be paid under S33 (1) leasehold reform housing and urban development act 1993 – application under S91 (2) (D) of the act Citations: [2015] UKFTT RP – LON – 00BH – Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: England and Wales Landlord and Tenant Updated: 27 November 2022; Ref: scu.626899
Application under section 91 (2) (d) of the leasehold reform housing and urban development act 1993 to determine the costs payable under section 60 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1993 Citations: [2015] UKFTT RP – LON – 00AK – Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: England and Wales Landlord and Tenant Updated: 17 October 2022; Ref: scu.626896
A notice said to have been given under section 13 of the 1993 Act to claim for to collective enfranchisement was invalid in that it failed to meet the requirements of section 13(3)(e). The notice failed properly to identify all the qualifying tenants and their addresses in the property. Judges: Sir Terence Etherton C, Patten, … Continue reading Natt and Another v Osman and Another: CA 26 Nov 2014
UTLC LEASEHOLD ENFRANCHISEMENT – collective enfranchisement – Leasehold Reform Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 Section 24 – whether agreement reached as to part of purchase price deprived LVT of jurisdiction to determine that element of the price – Schedule 9 paragraphs 2 and 4 – application of mandatory leaseback provisions – should the leaseback … Continue reading Westminster v Ch2006 Ltd: UTLC 17 Sep 2009
UTLC Leasehold enfranchisement – costs – initial notices – basis of assessment – costs of proceedings – unreasonable conduct – appeal allowed in part – section 33 Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 – paragraph 10 Schedule 12 Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 Citations: [2010] UKUT 81 (LC) Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: England … Continue reading Drax v Lawn Court Freehold Ltd: UTLC 24 Mar 2010
Assessment of costs under section 33 of the Leasehold Reform housing and urban development act 1993 Citations: [2015] UKFTT RP – OT – LON – 0 Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: England and Wales Landlord and Tenant Updated: 18 August 2022; Ref: scu.626949
LEASEHOLD ENFRANCHISEMENT – price payable for freehold of flats – value of freeholder’s interest – assessment of marriage value – yield – uplift – hope value – analysis of settlements and auction results – Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993, Schedule 6 paras 2-4 – price determined at pounds 33,300 Citations: [2001] EWLands … Continue reading Maryland Estates Ltd v Campana Court Ltd: LT 10 Apr 2001
Whether notice valid. Citations: [2002] EWCA Civ 1586 Links: Bailii Statutes: Leasehold Reform Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 33 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Landlord and Tenant Updated: 01 July 2022; Ref: scu.217776
LT LEASEHOLD ENFRANCHISEMENT – flat – premium for grant of new lease – yield – review rents – value of existing and proposed interests – compensation for loss or damage – valuation costs – Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993, section 60 and Schedule 13 Citations: [2001] EWLands LRA – 23 – 2000 … Continue reading Abacona Investements Ltd v Wright and others (Executors of Will of Eileen Elizabeth Yardley Deceased): LT 22 Feb 2001
F granted T a lease reserving the right to deal with all rights in the property as F wanted. T used the back court and gate for business deliveries but then F granted the freehold to the plaintiff, who in turn denied all right to use the back court or gate as T had been … Continue reading Green v Ashco Horticulturist Ltd: 1966
Acquisition of freehold (section 13 Leasehold Reform Housing and Urban Development Act 1993) Missing landlord Citations: [2015] UKFTT RP – LON – 00AY – Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: England and Wales Landlord and Tenant Updated: 30 May 2022; Ref: scu.627133
Patten, Sales, David Richards LJJ [2016] EWCA Civ 1176, [2016] WLR(D) 633 Bailii, WLRD Leasehold Reform Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 England and Wales Landlord and Tenant Updated: 26 January 2022; Ref: scu.571936
UTLC LEASEHOLD ENFRANCHISEMENT – intermediate leasehold interest – power of competent landlord to bind immediate landlord notwithstanding separate representation of immediate landlord – section 40(2) Leasehold Reform Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 [2014] UKUT 486 (LC) Bailii Leasehold Reform Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 40(2) England and Wales Landlord and Tenant Updated: 04 … Continue reading Howard De Walden Estates Ltd v Accordway Limited and Another: UTLC 28 Oct 2014
UTLC LEASEHOLD ENFRANCHISEMENT – Collective Enfranchisement – Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 section 1(4) – landlord’s counternotice offering grant of rights over additional land – counternotice also reserving rights to develop the additional land – construction of the leases regarding extent of lessees’ existing rights and lessor’s existing reservations over additional land … Continue reading Snowball Assets Ltd v Huntsmore House (Freehold) Ltd: UTLC 25 Jun 2015
The tenant had served a notice under the 2003 Act to acquire a new lease. The landlord in replying that he wished to redevelop the site, sought himself to define the extent of the ‘estate’ to include only the tenant’s apartment and a neighbouring one as ‘the whole or a substantial part of the premises … Continue reading Majorstake Ltd v Curtis: HL 6 Feb 2008
UTLC LEASEHOLD ENFRANCHISEMENT – flat – deferment rate – whether Zuckerman addition for management applicable to a well-run block in prime central London – held Zuckerman addition not applicable to such a building or at all Sir Jeremy Sullivan, Senior President and Mr N.J. Rose FRICS [2013] UKUT 0334 (LC) Bailii Leasehold Reform, Housing and … Continue reading Voyvoda v Grosvenor West End Properties and Another: UTLC 25 Jul 2013
LT LEASEHOLD ENFRANCHISEMENT – collective enfranchisement – whether price enhanced by value potentially available from a redevelopment of the building into a single house – extent of risks regarding ability to obtain vacant possession and carry out such redevelopment – how such risks would affect properly advised hypothetical purchaser – Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban … Continue reading Cadogan v 2 Herbert Crescent Freehold Ltd: LT 15 May 2009
The tenants of a block of flats issued a notice wanting to purchase the freehold at a price. The landlord failed to serve the appropriate counter-notice, and the tenants applied to court. The landlord asked the court to exercise its discretion to . .
1267 – 1278 – 1285 – 1297 – 1361 – 1449 – 1491 – 1533 – 1677 – 1688 – 1689 – 1700 – 1706 – 1710 – 1730 – 1737 – 1738 – 1751 – 1774 – 1792 – 1793 – 1804 – 1814 – 1819 – 1824 – 1828 – 1831 – 1832 … Continue reading Acts
