Click the case name for better results:

El-Gadhy and Another v Liverpool City Council: UTLC 21 Apr 2016

UTLC LEASEHOLD ENFRANCHISEMENT- house – price – entirety value – investment and comparable methods – investment method acceptable subject to appropriate yield – site ratio – settlement evidence and cleared site evidence – 30% adopted – unexpired term – price determined at andpound;19,389 – section 9(1), Leasehold Reform Act 1967 – appeal allowed [2016] UKUT … Continue reading El-Gadhy and Another v Liverpool City Council: UTLC 21 Apr 2016

31 Tower Bridge Road – Southwark : London (Houses/Flats – Enfranchisement, Lease Extensions and Compensation for Loss): LVT 11 May 2006

Houses/Flats – Enfranchisement, Lease Extensions and Compensation for Loss. Application to determine amount to be paid into court under section 9(1) of the 1967 Act. Citations: [2006] EWLVT LON – LV – HEL – 00BE – 0 Links: Bailii Statutes: Leasehold Reform Act 1967 9(1) 21 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Landlord and Tenant Updated: 16 … Continue reading 31 Tower Bridge Road – Southwark : London (Houses/Flats – Enfranchisement, Lease Extensions and Compensation for Loss): LVT 11 May 2006

Tsiapkinis v Earl Cadogan: LT 25 Jan 2008

LT LEASEHOLD ENFRANCHISEMENT – house – price – disputed site value – standing house approach – cleared site approach – comparables – site value percentage – whether LVT correct to look at direct evidence of site value by reference to developable space – purchase price determined at pounds 437,000 – appeal dismissed – Leasehold Reform … Continue reading Tsiapkinis v Earl Cadogan: LT 25 Jan 2008

Earl Cadogan v Pitts and Wang; Similar: HL 10 Dec 2008

The House considered the basis of valuation on an acquisition of the freehold reversion of a lease under the 1967 Act of the three elements, the rent, vacant possession after the lease, and the marriage or hope value of the two interests when merged, and particularly the last. Held: In relation to a valuation under … Continue reading Earl Cadogan v Pitts and Wang; Similar: HL 10 Dec 2008

Cadogan and others v 26 Cadogan Square Ltd, Howard de Walden Estates Limited v Aggio and others: HL 25 Jun 2008

In each case all or part of a building was let by a head-lease and then as self-contained units under sub-leases. The head lessees had served notices under the 1993 Act requiring new leases. The freeholder denied that they were qualifying tenants, either because there were a number of flats, or because the lease included … Continue reading Cadogan and others v 26 Cadogan Square Ltd, Howard de Walden Estates Limited v Aggio and others: HL 25 Jun 2008