Click the case name for better results:

Brunt and others v Southampton International Airport Ltd: CA 7 Feb 2005

The claimants lived near Southampton Airport. The airport was altered to allow larger aircraft to use it, and they claimed damages for the increased noise and disturbance. Land had been acquired for additional parking. The number of aircraft flying would not increase, though the number of passengers would. Held: A claim for noise disturbance could … Continue reading Brunt and others v Southampton International Airport Ltd: CA 7 Feb 2005

Regina (on the application of Gilbert) v Plymouth City Airport Limited; W W Thomas v Secretary of State for Transport, Environment and Regions: CA 8 Feb 2001

The airport was the operator liable for compensation. The apron was extended to allow for two more helicopters to be based at the airport, and a neighbouring householder claimed compensation for loss to the value of his house. The Secretary’s certificate was correct. The works were substantial alterations and the requirements of the section had … Continue reading Regina (on the application of Gilbert) v Plymouth City Airport Limited; W W Thomas v Secretary of State for Transport, Environment and Regions: CA 8 Feb 2001

Brunt and others v Southampton International Airport Ltd: LT 19 Dec 2003

LT COMPENSATION – Land Compensation Act 1973 Part I – aerodrome – substantial alterations to aprons – whether purpose or main purpose the provision of facilities for a greater number of aircraft – held that it was not – 1973 Act section 9(6) Citations: [2003] EWLands LCA – 225 – 2001 Links: Bailii Statutes: Land … Continue reading Brunt and others v Southampton International Airport Ltd: LT 19 Dec 2003