Click the case name for better results:

Regina v Inland Revenue Commissioners, Ex Parte Newfields Developments Ltd: CA 15 Feb 2000

The test in the section, provided the conclusive test to establish who had control of a company. The commissioners had no discretion as to how or when to apply the criteria. The first part listed several ways in which the identity and number of people with control was to be calculated, and the second limb … Continue reading Regina v Inland Revenue Commissioners, Ex Parte Newfields Developments Ltd: CA 15 Feb 2000

Steele v EVC International NV: 1996

Control of a company within the section means shareholder control. Citations: [1996] STC 785 Statutes: Income and Corporation Taxes Act 1988 416 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: Cited – Foulser and Another v HM Inspector of Taxes ChD 20-Dec-2005 The taxpayer company entered into an arrangement in which shares were purchased by a company … Continue reading Steele v EVC International NV: 1996

Regina v Inland Revenue Commissioners, ex parte Newfields Developments Ltd: HL 21 Jun 2001

Tax relief for smaller companies was to be reduced where a person controlling the company was associated with other companies. The taxpayer was found to be in control of two companies by virtue of her associations with two trusts with control of two companies. She argued that the section gave a discretion as to the … Continue reading Regina v Inland Revenue Commissioners, ex parte Newfields Developments Ltd: HL 21 Jun 2001

Taylor (Inspector of Taxes) v MEPC Holdings Ltd: CA 20 Jun 2002

The taxpayer sought to include in the amounts to be set off by surrender against the group’s liability for corporation tax, chargeable gains in respect of allowable losses of a preceding accounting period. They appealed a decision against them at first instance. Held: The 1988 Act clearly did not allow amounts to be set off … Continue reading Taylor (Inspector of Taxes) v MEPC Holdings Ltd: CA 20 Jun 2002