Click the case name for better results:

Sandhu, Regina (on the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department: Admn 16 Sep 2003

The claimant challenged the refusal of a right to appeal against the decision refusing hs asylum appeal. He had failed to attend two hearings. The respondent gave his certificate under section 73 that in his opinion the only purpose of the appeal was to delay removal. Held: The correct approach was to to treat it … Continue reading Sandhu, Regina (on the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department: Admn 16 Sep 2003

Regina (Vemenac) v Secretary of State for the Home Department: Admn 17 Jul 2002

The applicant was a Serb from Croatia whose application for asylum was refused. On appeal to an adjudicator he also raised human rights issues but his appeal was dismissed. He later applied again for leave to remain on the basis of his relationship with a woman (invoking Article 8 of the European Convention) and by … Continue reading Regina (Vemenac) v Secretary of State for the Home Department: Admn 17 Jul 2002

Balamurali, Regina (on the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department: Admn 9 May 2003

Mitting J [2003] EWHC 1183 (Admin) Bailii Immigration and Asylum Act 1999 73(8) England and Wales Citing: Disapproved – Regina (Vemenac) v Secretary of State for the Home Department Admn 17-Jul-2002 The applicant was a Serb from Croatia whose application for asylum was refused. On appeal to an adjudicator he also raised human rights issues … Continue reading Balamurali, Regina (on the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department: Admn 9 May 2003

Regina (Ngamguem) v Secretary of State for the Home Department: Admn 8 Jul 2002

The applicant a native of Cameroon, had sought asylum. He was refused. His appeal to an adjudicator was dismissed, and directions for his removal were given. Some months later his solicitors submitted what they said was new evidence. They asked for . .