Click the case name for better results:

In re F (otherwise A ) (A Minor) (Publication of Information): CA 1977

An allegation of contempt was made in proceedings related to the publication by a newspaper of extracts from a report by a social worker and a report by the Official Solicitor, both prepared after the commencement and for the purpose of the wardship proceedings. Held: What was published was ‘information relating to [the] proceedings’ within … Continue reading In re F (otherwise A ) (A Minor) (Publication of Information): CA 1977

Surrey Police (Decision Notice): ICO 13 Jun 2013

ICO The complainants requested information about the cost of a specific police operation. Regarding the information that was held, Surrey Police said that it could not be provided without exceeding the costs limit under section 12(1) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA). The Commissioner considers that section 12 of FOIA was applied correctly … Continue reading Surrey Police (Decision Notice): ICO 13 Jun 2013

Cambridgeshire County Council (Decision Notice): ICO 17 May 2012

ICO The complainant requested information relating to all court and tribunal cases that Cambridgeshire County Council . . had been involved in since January 2007. The council refused to comply with the request on the basis of an exclusion relating to costs under section 12(1) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 . . The … Continue reading Cambridgeshire County Council (Decision Notice): ICO 17 May 2012

Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council (Decision Notice): ICO 9 Sep 2013

The complainant requested information about the number of licensed taxi drivers with serious criminal convictions for violence from Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council. The council refused to comply with the request on the basis that to do so would exceed the appropriate limit in costs set by section 12(1) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000. … Continue reading Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council (Decision Notice): ICO 9 Sep 2013

University Hospitals of Morecambe Bay Nhs Foundation Trust (Health (Nhs)): ICO 5 May 2015

The complainant requested information about communications between 3 UHMB directors and Monitor and the Care Quality Commission in 2010. The University Hospitals of Morecambe Bay NHS Foundation Trust (UHMB) stated that to carry out an electronic search would breach the cost limits set by section 12(1) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (‘the FOIA’). … Continue reading University Hospitals of Morecambe Bay Nhs Foundation Trust (Health (Nhs)): ICO 5 May 2015

Hampshire County Council (Local Government): ICO 24 Mar 2021

The complainant requested information about two different types of statutory notices issued by Hampshire County Council (the council) under the Highways Act 1980. The council issued a refusal notice to the complainant, initially citing section 12(1) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA). During the Commissioner’s investigation the council revised its position, confirming that … Continue reading Hampshire County Council (Local Government): ICO 24 Mar 2021

Epsom and Ewell Borough Council (Decision Notice): ICO 30 Aug 2012

The complainant requested information from Epsom and Ewell Borough Council relating to outsourcing to solicitors or barristers. The council supplied information relating to three years only and relied upon section 12(1) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000, the exclusion relating to the costs limit, for the remainder. The Commissioner’s decision is that the council … Continue reading Epsom and Ewell Borough Council (Decision Notice): ICO 30 Aug 2012

Stroud District Council (Decision Notice): ICO 14 Aug 2012

The complainant requested information regarding planning enforcement issues. Stroud District Council initially relied on the exemption under section 30 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000, the exemption relating to investigations and section 12(1), an exclusion relating to costs. Following the Commissioner’s involvement, the council decided to disclose information to the complainant. The only outstanding … Continue reading Stroud District Council (Decision Notice): ICO 14 Aug 2012

Havering London Borough Council (Decision Notice): ICO 10 Oct 2013

The complainant requested information about complaints, accidents and enquiries concerning low hanging or dangerous trees or branches within a specified timescale. London Borough of Havering (the Council) said that it could not be provided without exceeding the costs limit under section 12(1) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA). The Commissioner considers that section … Continue reading Havering London Borough Council (Decision Notice): ICO 10 Oct 2013

Leeds City Council (Decision Notice): ICO 12 Sep 2011

The complainant requested, under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (the Act), all the information it held on its internet and intranet IT systems for two years in a specified format and all other information held electronically about a set of meetings. The Council considered that the request was in its context vexatious by virtue … Continue reading Leeds City Council (Decision Notice): ICO 12 Sep 2011

Oldham Metropolitan Borough Council (Decision Notice): ICO 3 Jan 2013

The complainant requested information from Oldham Metropolitan Borough Council relating to the number of people charged in police station custody areas by the council during the years 2003 until 2011. The council said that some information was not held. Regarding the information that was held, the council said that it could not be provided without … Continue reading Oldham Metropolitan Borough Council (Decision Notice): ICO 3 Jan 2013

Caerphilly County Borough Council (Decision Notice): ICO 26 Feb 2013

The complainant requested a list of all services offered by Caerphilly County Borough Council (‘the Council’) which have a charge attached for the financial year 2012 to 2013. The Council aggregated this request with five other requests for the same information but different tax years and subsequently refused it on the basis of section 12(1) … Continue reading Caerphilly County Borough Council (Decision Notice): ICO 26 Feb 2013

Her Majestys Courts Service (Decision Notice): ICO 9 May 2011

The complainant requested information relating to successful and unsuccessful judicial review applications from Her Majesty’s Court Service (HMCS), an executive agency of the Ministry of Justice. HMCS refused to comply with the request on grounds of cost. The Commissioner has investigated and finds that compliance with the request would have exceeded the appropriate costs limit … Continue reading Her Majestys Courts Service (Decision Notice): ICO 9 May 2011

Ofcom (Decision Notice): ICO 21 Jun 2010

ICO On 2 March 2009 the complainant submitted a Freedom of Information request to Ofcom regarding the number of complaints which Ofcom had received where the initial verdict had been overturned. Initially, Ofcom refused this request in general terms but then revised its approach and in its subsequent refusal relied upon cost considerations and applied … Continue reading Ofcom (Decision Notice): ICO 21 Jun 2010

Transport for London (Decision Notice): ICO 26 Mar 2014

The complainant requested information about Penalty Charge Notices (PCNs) to Transport for London (TfL). TfL initially stated that it did not hold the information as requested but at internal review it also stated that to try and comply with the request would exceed the appropriate limit in costs set by section 12(1) of the Freedom … Continue reading Transport for London (Decision Notice): ICO 26 Mar 2014

Newport City Council (Decision Notice): ICO 27 Oct 2011

The complainant made a request for information held by Newport City Council relating to various projects and initiatives. The Council stated that to comply with the request would exceed the appropriate cost limit and refused the request on the basis that section 12(1) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 was engaged. During the course … Continue reading Newport City Council (Decision Notice): ICO 27 Oct 2011

Blackpool Borough Council (Decision Notice): ICO 27 Feb 2013

The complainant requested information from Blackpool Borough Council about how much it had spent on outsourcing to either barristers or solicitors for employment tribunals between 1 August 2000 and 31 October 2010. The council refused to comply with the request on the basis that section 12(1) was engaged, the exclusion relating to the costs limit … Continue reading Blackpool Borough Council (Decision Notice): ICO 27 Feb 2013

Gloucester City Council (Decision Notice): ICO 7 Aug 2013

The complainant requested information from Gloucester City Council (the council) relating to internet visits on an officer by officer basis, although he did not require individual names or user IDs. The council refused to comply with the request, relying on the exclusion under section 12(1) and the exemption under section 40(2) of the Freedom of … Continue reading Gloucester City Council (Decision Notice): ICO 7 Aug 2013

Wood Green High School (Decision Notice): ICO 16 Jul 2009

The complainant made a request to the Governing Body of Wood Green High School (the ‘School’) for information relating to the letting of School facilities. The School provided its lettings policy but refused to provide the complainant with the rest of the requested information and relied upon the provisions contained at sections 12 and 14 … Continue reading Wood Green High School (Decision Notice): ICO 16 Jul 2009

Cabinet Office (Central Government) – FS50676679: ICO 22 Nov 2017

The complainant requested information from the Cabinet Office relating to correspondence it received about a proposed visit from the President of the United States of America, Donald Trump. The Cabinet Office refused the request under section 12(1) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (the Act) as it considered that compliance with the request would … Continue reading Cabinet Office (Central Government) – FS50676679: ICO 22 Nov 2017

Camden and Islington Foundation Nhs (Decision Notice): ICO 1 Sep 2011

The complainant requested under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 copies of all papers (minutes, reports, agendas and all other documents) for the closed parts of all board of directors meetings held by the Trust since 1 July 2009. The Trust responded that the costs limit [section 12(1)] applied and provided no information. The complainant … Continue reading Camden and Islington Foundation Nhs (Decision Notice): ICO 1 Sep 2011

Office of Communications (Decision Notice): ICO 21 Dec 2009

The complainant made a series of requests to Ofcom regarding the number of complaints received from viewers/listeners that were deemed not to have broken any broadcasting code and which on review, were subsequently overturned. Ofcom refused the request on cost grounds under section 12 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000. The Commissioner finds that … Continue reading Office of Communications (Decision Notice): ICO 21 Dec 2009

Cabinet Office (Central Government) FS50559082: ICO 24 Nov 2015

ICO The complainant requested information from the Cabinet Office relating to the appointment of qualified persons within the Public and Health Service Ombudsman (PHSO). The Cabinet Office refused this request under section 12(1) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (the Act) because it considered complying with the request would exceed the appropriate limit. The … Continue reading Cabinet Office (Central Government) FS50559082: ICO 24 Nov 2015

Cabinet Office (Central Government ) FS50579066: ICO 12 Oct 2015

ICO The complainant requested information relating to a speech by the then Minister for the Civil Service. The Cabinet Office refused the request under section 12(1) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (the Act) as it considered compliance with the request would exceed the appropriate limit. The Commissioner’s decision is that the Cabinet Office … Continue reading Cabinet Office (Central Government ) FS50579066: ICO 12 Oct 2015

Cabinet Office (Central Government) FS50560132: ICO 17 Aug 2015

ICO The complainant requested information relating to the public duty cost allowance afforded to former Prime Ministers of the UK. The Cabinet Office refused the request under sections 21(1), 22(1) and 40(2) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (the Act). During the course of the investigation the Cabinet Office sought to rely on sections … Continue reading Cabinet Office (Central Government) FS50560132: ICO 17 Aug 2015

Ministry of Justice (Decision Notice) FS50282165: ICO 21 Dec 2010

ICA On 24 October 2009, the complainant requested that the Ministry of Justice (the ‘MoJ’) should provide him with information regarding how many male prisoners had been allowed to use artificial insemination with their partners in each of the last ten years and how many female prisoners had become pregnant in the same time period. … Continue reading Ministry of Justice (Decision Notice) FS50282165: ICO 21 Dec 2010

Camden Council (Decision Notice): ICO 21 Dec 2010

ICO Decision Notice: The complainant requested the address of every empty residential property in the London Borough of Camden in which a non-individual is listed as either being the owner or as having a material interest in the property. The London Borough of Camden (‘the Council’) refused to provide the information, citing the exemption under … Continue reading Camden Council (Decision Notice): ICO 21 Dec 2010

Department for Education (Decision Notice): ICO 22 Nov 2010

On 31 March 2010 the complainant requested that the Department for Education (then the Department for Children Schools and Families) provide him with the names and rail expenses of staff at all grades of SEO and above who had travelled first class and standard class between Darlington and London in 2008. The DfE refused the … Continue reading Department for Education (Decision Notice): ICO 22 Nov 2010

Department of Health (Decision Notice): ICO 30 Mar 2010

ICO The complainant submitted a seven-part request to the Department of Health concerning the correspondence which the DH may have exchanged with HRH The Prince of Wales and His Royal Highness’representatives. The DH initially refused to confirm or deny whether it held information falling within the scope of the request in reliance on section 37(2) … Continue reading Department of Health (Decision Notice): ICO 30 Mar 2010

Department of Health (Decision Notice): ICO 14 Nov 2011

ICO The complainant has requested from the Department of Health Information about the public authority’s procedures around Summary Care Records. The DoH provided some information, applied section 21(1) to other information and explained that it did not hold any more information. The complainant referred this matter to the Information Commissioner. During the course of the … Continue reading Department of Health (Decision Notice): ICO 14 Nov 2011

Department of Health (Decision Notice): ICO 9 Nov 2011

ICO The complainant made a number of requests for information to the Department of Health about the new NHS bill and other issues about its handling of the correspondence. He referred six of these requests to the Information Commissioner who numbered them requests [1] to [6]. The DoH confirmed that it had answered request [1] … Continue reading Department of Health (Decision Notice): ICO 9 Nov 2011

Lincolnshire Police (Decision Notice): ICO 15 Aug 2011

The complainant asked Lincolnshire Police (the ‘public authority’) to provide information relating to European Arrest Warrants. The public authority refused to disclose this using the exemptions in section 12(1) (cost of compliance exceeds the appropriate limit), further stating that any information it might be able to provide under the cost limit was likely to be … Continue reading Lincolnshire Police (Decision Notice): ICO 15 Aug 2011

City University (Decision Notice): ICO 23 Jun 2011

The complainant requested under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 the workplace email addresses of all of the University’s staff. The University confirmed that it held the information, but considered that the request was invalid. If the request was not invalid, then it believed sections 14(1), 21(1),38(1) 40(2) and section 44(1) of the Act applied … Continue reading City University (Decision Notice): ICO 23 Jun 2011

Hartlepool Borough Council (Decision Notice): ICO 16 May 2011

ICO The complainant requested information relating to the independent valuation of a number of properties. The valuations had been obtained because the Council wished to purchase the properties as part of a redevelopment scheme. The Council refused to provide the information, citing the exclusions under section 12(1), 14(1) and 14(2). It also sought to rely … Continue reading Hartlepool Borough Council (Decision Notice): ICO 16 May 2011

Her Majestys Revenue and Customs (Decision Notice): ICO 1 Feb 2011

ICO The complainant made two requests to HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) for advice and guidance relating to managerial responsibility towards the welfare of staff. With reference to the first request, HMRC stated that it did not hold any specific information, a position that the Commissioner agrees with. In relation to the second request, HMRC … Continue reading Her Majestys Revenue and Customs (Decision Notice): ICO 1 Feb 2011

Hartlepool Borough Council (Decision Notice): ICO 30 Apr 2013

ICO The complainant requested a large amount of information from Hartlepool Borough Council (‘the council’) in the form of multiple requests relating to equal pay claims and job evaluations. The council provided a significant amount of information. However, in relation to seven of the requests, the council relied on the exclusion under section 12(1) of … Continue reading Hartlepool Borough Council (Decision Notice): ICO 30 Apr 2013

Department for Education (Decision Notice): ICO 20 Feb 2014

ICO The complainant requested information on the Prince’s Consent to the Department for Education (DfE). The DfE refused to comply with the request on the basis that to do so would exceed the appropriate limit in costs set by section 12(1) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (‘the FOIA’). The Commissioner’s decision is that … Continue reading Department for Education (Decision Notice): ICO 20 Feb 2014

Department for Work and Pensions (Central Government): ICO 15 Nov 2017

The complainant requested information from the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) relating to its Unacceptable Customer Behaviour policy. The DWP refused the requests under section 12(1) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (the Act) as compliance with the requests would exceed the appropriate limit. The Commissioner’s decision is that the DWP is entitled … Continue reading Department for Work and Pensions (Central Government): ICO 15 Nov 2017