Citations: [2015] ScotHC HCJAC – 52 Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: Scotland Crime Updated: 03 November 2022; Ref: scu.552273
1267 – 1278 – 1285 – 1297 – 1361 – 1449 – 1491 – 1533 – 1677 – 1688 – 1689 – 1700 – 1706 – 1710 – 1730 – 1737 – 1738 – 1751 – 1774 – 1792 – 1793 – 1804 – 1814 – 1819 – 1824 – 1828 – 1831 – 1832 … Continue reading Acts
Prosecution to protect defendant not available The claimants faced extradition to the US. They said that the respondent had infringed their human rights by deciding not to prosecute them in the UK. There was no mutuality in the Act under which they were to be extradited. Held: The Director had a discretion as to whether … Continue reading Bermingham and others v The Director of the Serious Fraud Office: QBD 21 Feb 2006
Judges: Mr Justice Chamberlain Citations: [2021] EWHC 1096 (Admin) Links: Bailii Statutes: Extradition Act 2003 103 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Extradition Updated: 25 November 2022; Ref: scu.662323
Citations: [2006] EWHC 1150 (Admin) Links: Bailii Statutes: Extradition Act 2003 103 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Extradition Updated: 14 November 2022; Ref: scu.242197
The appellant resisted his extrdition to Argentina. The court now set out its reasons for not admitting the new medical evidence on which the appeal was based. Judges: Laws LJ, Swift J Citations: [2013] EWHC 226 (Admin) Links: Bailii Statutes: Extradition Act 2003 103 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Extradition Updated: 14 November 2022; Ref: scu.470995
The defendant appealed against an order for his extradition, saying that the request was defective in three respects, and that there was a bar to extradition in that, due to the passage of time since the alleged abuse is said to have taken place, it would be unjust or oppressive to extradite the appellant to … Continue reading Beresford v The Government of the Commonwealth of Australia: Admn 13 Oct 2005
Citations: [2006] EWHC (Admin) 1616 Links: Bailii Statutes: Extradition Act 2003 103 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Extradition Updated: 29 August 2022; Ref: scu.242958
Judges: Pill LJ, Pitchford J Citations: [2008] EWHC 2856 (Admin) Links: Bailii Statutes: Extradition Act 2003 103 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Extradition Updated: 30 July 2022; Ref: scu.278261
Appeal, under section 103 from the decision to send the matter to the Secretary of State for Home Affairs to consider extraditing Zeqaj to Albania to serve a sentence of 23 years in connection with murder and firearms offences. Judges: Gross LJ, Gloster DBE J Citations: [2013] EWHC 261 (Admin) Links: Bailii Statutes: Extradition Act … Continue reading Zeqaj v Government of Albania: Admn 20 Feb 2013
Judges: Latham LJ, McCombe J Citations: [2006] EWHC 1750 (Admin) Links: Bailii Statutes: Extradition Act 2003 103 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Extradition Updated: 07 July 2022; Ref: scu.243304
Citations: [2005] EWHC 1078 (Admin) Links: Bailii Statutes: Extradition Act 2003 103 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Extradition Updated: 11 May 2022; Ref: scu.226276
Mr Justice Chamberlain [2022] EWHC 13 (Admin) Bailii Extradition Act 2003 103 England and Wales Extradition Updated: 21 January 2022; Ref: scu.670949
The defendant appealed against an order for his extradition to the USA to face extra-territorial terrorist charges. Held: The court dismissed the appeal: ‘whether the appellant is a British citizen or not makes no difference to his relevant Article 6 rights. Our reasons are as follows: the ECtHR has stated many times that a decision … Continue reading Pham v The United States of America: Admn 12 Dec 2014
The defendant claimed that the Home Secretary had worngfully issued a certificate under section 70 to support his extradition. Held: On the facts the defendant’s claim failed, but the court considered that in the case of a wrongfully issued certficate, the proper remedy was by way of judicial review. Mr Justice Clarke Lord Justice Scott … Continue reading Cuneyit Akaroglu v The Government of Romania; Regina (Akaroglu) v Secretary of State for the Home Department: QBD 1 Mar 2007
The defendant appealed against an order granting her extradition to Norway.
Held: Though the defendant had not raised the issue of the required double criminality before the district judge, she would be allowed to do so on appeal because of . .
The defendant was the former chief executive of a company manufacturing carbon products internationally. His extradition to the US was sought on the basis that he had conspired in a dishonest price-fixing conspiracy.
Held: The secrecy of such . .
(Belize) The Criminal Code of Belize provided that any murder by shooting was to be treated as Class A Murder, and be subject to the mandatory death penalty. The applicant having been convicted, appealed saying this was inhuman or degrading treatment, and infringed his human rights under the constitution. Held: The crime of murder embraced … Continue reading Reyes v The Queen: PC 11 Mar 2002
The Court was asked whether it would be compatible with the appellant’s Convention rights within the meaning of the Human Rights Act 1998 for the appellant, who is an Albanian national, to be extradited to Albania. On 7 April 2001, while he was in the United Kingdom as an illegal immigrant, another Albanian national named … Continue reading Kapri v The Lord Advocate (Representing The Government of The Republic of Albania): SC 10 Jul 2013
Extradition appeal on grounds invoking section 14 of the Extradition Act 2003 (injustice or oppression by reason of the passage of time) and Article 8 ECHR (disproportionate interference with private or family life). Judges: Mr Justice Fordham Citations: [2022] EWHC 1697 (Admin) Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: England and Wales Extradition Updated: 26 July 2022; Ref: scu.679103
Reference to Parliamentary Papers behind Statute The inspector sought to tax the benefits in kind received by teachers at a private school in having their children educated at the school for free. Having agreed this was a taxable emolument, it was argued as to whether the taxable benefit was the cost to the employer, or … Continue reading Pepper (Inspector of Taxes) v Hart: HL 26 Nov 1992
A police officer appealed against his conviction for manslaughter after being involved in a road traffic accident. Two were killed. The policemen complained as to the direction given on gross negligence manslaughter. Held: Adomako could not apply in jurisdictions where causing a death by reckless driving is a possible alternative to a charge of manslaughter. … Continue reading Brown v The Queen (Jamaica): PC 13 Apr 2005
Each appellant challenged orders for their extradition, saying that the delay had been too prolonged, and that detention in Trinidad’s appalling jails would be an infringement of their human rights. Held: The House had to consider its own decision in Kakis which effectively excluded delay as a consideration save in exceptional circumstances. Delay caused by … Continue reading Gomes v Trinidad and Tobago: HL 29 Apr 2009
The House was asked whether someone who wished to appeal against an extradition order had an obligation also to serve his appellant’s notice on the respondent within the seven days limit, and whether the period was capable of extension by the court. Held: The appeal failed (Lord Rodger dissenting). Giving notice, for the purposes of … Continue reading Mucelli v Government of Albania (Criminal Appeal From Her Majesty’s High Court of Justice): HL 21 Jan 2009
Fairness of SIAC procedures Each defendant was to be deported for fear of involvement in terrorist activities, but feared that if returned to their home countries, they would be tortured. The respondent had obtained re-assurances from the destination governments that this would not happen. Held: Though in each case, SIAC had considered special materials, the … Continue reading RB (Algeria) and Another v Secretary of State for the Home Department; OO (Jordan) v Same; MT (Algeria) v Same: HL 18 Feb 2009
(Grand Chamber) Air strikes were carried out by NATO forces against radio and television facilities in Belgrade on 23 April 1999. The claims of five of the applicants arose out of the deaths of relatives in this raid. The sixth claimed on his own account in respect of injuries sustained during the raid. The claimants … Continue reading Bankovic v Belgium: ECHR 12 Dec 2001
Extraditions to follow normal open justice rules Application was made by Rwanda for the extradition of four individuals to face crimes said to have been committed during their civil war. Witnesses were prepared to give evidence but only in private and not being seen by the representatives of Rwanda. Held: The magistrate hearing such proceedings … Continue reading VB and Others v Westminster Magistrates: SC 5 Nov 2014
Rejection of Submission of No Case to Answer The defendant had faced a charge of affray. The court having rejected his submission of having no case to answer, he had made an exculpatory statement from the dock. He appealed against his conviction. Held: Lord Lane LCJ said: ‘How then should the judge approach a submission … Continue reading Regina v Galbraith: CCA 1981
The deceased soldier died of heat exhaustion whilst on active service in Iraq. It was said that he was owed a duty under human rights laws, and that any coroner’s inquest should be a fuller one to satisfy the state’s duty under Article 2. Held: The SSD’s appeal succeeded. ‘jurisdiction’ within the meaning of Article … Continue reading Smith, Regina (on The Application of) v Secretary of State for Defence and Oxfordshire Assistant Deputy Coroner (Equality and Human Rights Commission intervening): SC 30 Jun 2010
The appellant sought to avoid extradition to the US. He had hacked into 97 US government computers. He argued that the punishment he might expect in the US was completely disproportionate to the offence, and that he had been misled into entering into a plea bargain making the extradition an abuse of process. Held: The … Continue reading McKinnon v The United States of America and Anotherr: HL 30 Jul 2008
The detainee appealed an order for extradition to the USA, saying that the offence (price-fixing) was not one known to English common law. The USA sought his extradition under the provisions of the Sherman Act. Held: It was not, and it would be wrong in principle to decide that it was: ‘The common law recognised … Continue reading Norris v United States of America and others: HL 12 Mar 2008
‘Rolled-up’ application under section 103(1) of the Extradition Act 2003 (‘the 2003 Act’) for permission to appeal against the decision of District Judge Richard Blake on 31 May 2019 to send the applicant’s case to the Secretary of State under . .
A clerk was instructed, after filing a notice of appeal, to serve it on the Crown Prosecution Service with a letter on which he wrote the relevant Crown Office reference. The letter was expressed to cover the delivery of the appellant’s notice and . .
(Grand Chamber) When considering the appropriateness of a deportation order to a country with which the deporting country had a memorandum of understanding that the destination country would not torture the deportee, a court must look beyond the . .
The two prisoners, serving life sentences for murder, had had their appeals rejected. They continued to protest innocence, and sought to bring their campaigns to public attention through the press, having oral interviews with journalists without . .
Our law-index is a substantial selection from our database. Cases here are restricted in number by date and lack the additional facilities formerly available within lawindexpro. Please do enjoy this free version of the lawindex. Case law does not ‘belong’ to lawyers. Judgments are made up of words which can be read and understood (if … Continue reading law index
