The applicant had soft tissue injuries around the spine as a consequence of a back injury at work. He was absent from work for a long time as a result of his injuries, and he was eventually dismissed when his medical advisers could provide no clear idea of when it would be possible for him … Continue reading Clark v TDG Limited (Trading As Novacold): CA 25 Mar 1999
EAT EQUAL PAY ACT – Other establishmentsPRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – AmendmentJURISDICTIONAL POINTS – 2002 Act and pre-action requirementsThree groups of appeals arising out of mass equal pay litigation(A) Amendment permitted to correct misdescriptions by Claimants of the jobs that they were doing(B) Employees employed by the Council in non-teaching roles in community schools entitled to … Continue reading Birmingham City Council v Beck and Others: EAT 9 May 2011
EAT EQUAL PAY ACT – Other establishmentsPRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – AmendmentJURISDICTIONAL POINTS – 2002 Act and pre-action requirementsThree groups of appeals arising out of mass equal pay litigation(A) Amendment permitted to correct misdescriptions by Claimants of the jobs that they were doing(B) Employees employed by the Council in non-teaching roles in community schools entitled to … Continue reading Birmingham City Council v Barker: EAT 9 May 2011
EAT EQUAL PAY ACT – Other establishments PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Amendment JURISDICTIONAL POINTS – 2002 Act and pre-action requirementsThree groups of appeals arising out of mass equal pay litigation (A) Amendment permitted to correct misdescriptions by Claimants of the jobs that they were doing (B) Employees employed by the Council in non-teaching roles in … Continue reading Beddoes and Others v Birmingham City Council: EAT 9 May 2011
EAT EQUAL PAY ACT – Other establishmentsPRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – AmendmentJURISDICTIONAL POINTS – 2002 Act and pre-action requirementsThree groups of appeals arising out of mass equal pay litigation(A) Amendment permitted to correct misdescriptions by Claimants of the jobs that they were doing(B) Employees employed by the Council in non-teaching roles in community schools entitled to … Continue reading Birmingham City Council v Akhtar and Others: EAT 9 May 2011
EAT Time Limits Practice and Procedure – 2002 Act and pre-action requirements Unfair Dismissal – Constructive dismissalFor the purpose of the extension of the time afforded by reg. 15 of the Employment Act 2002 (Dispute Resolution) Regulations 2004, an employee’s grievance is to be treated as lodged ‘within the normal time limit’ even if it … Continue reading London Borough of Lewisham v Colbourne: EAT 15 Nov 2006
roberts_acumedEAT10 EAT UNFAIR DISMISSAL Reason for dismissal including substantial other reason Reasonableness of dismissal Procedural fairness/automatically unfair dismissal The Claimant area sales manager was remunerated on a different basis from the other four area managers. His commission was based on total sales whereas theirs was based on annual increase in sales. On reviewing remuneration the … Continue reading Roberts v Acumed Ltd: EAT 25 Nov 2010
1267 – 1278 – 1285 – 1297 – 1361 – 1449 – 1491 – 1533 – 1677 – 1688 – 1689 – 1700 – 1706 – 1710 – 1730 – 1737 – 1738 – 1751 – 1774 – 1792 – 1793 – 1804 – 1814 – 1819 – 1824 – 1828 – 1831 – 1832 … Continue reading Acts
