The claimant had been stopped by customs. He had imported various items which it was alleged exceeded the amounts appropriate for personal use. The goods had been mixed with those of his travelling companion. At trial he sought to challenge the fact that the Customs had treated his and his companion’s goods together. Held: The … Continue reading Fox v Commissioners of Customs and Excise: QBD 3 Jul 2002
Hudoc No violation of P1-1; No violation of Art. 6-1
An aeroplane was seized as liable to forfeiture pursuant to section 141(1) of the 1979 Act. It was restored on payment of a penalty of andpound;50,000. . .
Refusal to permit making of late appeal. Applicant sought to appeal – under section 16 Finance Act 1994 – a decision under section 152(b) Customs and Excise Management Act 1979 refusing to restore vehicle seized under section 139(1) of that act as being liable to forfeiture under section 141(1)(a) of the act. Whether document sent … Continue reading Mozer v Revenue and Customs (Procedure : Other): FTTTx 13 Dec 2021
The appellants challenged decisions of the VAT and Duties Tribunal after seizure of their goods, and in particular whether the cases had been criminal or civil cases and following Roth, whether the respondent’s policy had been lawful and proportionate. Held: The present procedure does not involve the criminal courts and the absence of any criminal … Continue reading Gora and others v Commissioners of Customs and Excise and others: CA 11 Apr 2003
Appeal against decision under section 152(b) of the Customs and Excise Management Act 1979 refusing to restore vehicle seized under section 139(1) of that act as being liable to forfeiture under section 141(1)(a) of the act. Failure to supply . .
The applicant was stopped at Customs carrying cigarettes over the quantity set for personal use. His car was seized, and Customs refused to return it. The cigarettes were for his own use and for sale to family members. He claimed the seizure was an . .
