Click the case name for better results:

Regina v Moore, Kerr, Haroon: CACD 5 Oct 2001

The applicants challenged the procedures under which, having been found unfit to plead by proceedings under the section, they were then found to have committed the acts forming the offences. The defendants were unable to put forward any case in rebuttal. Applications to stay proceedings as an abuse of process had failed. Were such proceedings … Continue reading Regina v Moore, Kerr, Haroon: CACD 5 Oct 2001

Regina v Chal: CACD 5 Oct 2007

The defendant appealed the decision of the court in a hearing under the 1964 Act that he had been involved in the offence at issue. He said the court had been wrong to admit hearsay evidence. Held: The prosecution had had to present evidence under section 116(2)(d) of the 2003 Act, by way of a … Continue reading Regina v Chal: CACD 5 Oct 2007