Scott Baker LJ said that: ‘We think it is important to point out that, as a matter of generality, section 114 cannot and should not be applied so as to render section 116 nugatory.But section 114(1)(d) should not be so narrowly applied that it has no effect. It follows that there will be cases in … Continue reading O’Hare, Regina v: CACD 7 Sep 2006

The defendant appealed against convictions for rape and indecent assault under the 1956 Act. The allegations dated from 1985 to 1989 when the complainant had been between 9 and 13. The prosecution brought in a doctor who said that in 1993 D complained of sexual abuse by Z when she was a young girl. D … Continue reading Regina v Z: CACD 23 Jan 2009

The court considered the application of the 2003 Act to communications made to, or by, the defendant, and in particular text messages sent by mobile telephone. Held: The four appeals against conviction were dismissed. Singh established that the common law rules on hearsay had been abolished by the 2003 Act. The court set out its … Continue reading Regina v Twist and Others: CACD 12 May 2011

A witness had been warned to attend court, but had not served with an order and did not attend. The defendant appealed against his conviction saying that her evidence should not have been read to the jury. He had faced allegations of sexual abuse of his wife’s younger sisters. Two gave evidence, but the third … Continue reading Regina v EED: CACD 28 May 2010