The test for whether or not to recall a lifer who was free on licence is the same test as was used for his release, namely whether his detention was required for the protection of the public. Citations: Independent 22-Nov-1995 Statutes: Criminal Justice Act 1991 34(4)(b) Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: Appeal from – … Continue reading Regina v Parole Board, Ex Parte Watson: QBD 22 Nov 1995
The concept of ‘risk’ was not confined to risk to the United Kingdom public alone, as a result of which the Parole Board is entitled, indeed, in an appropriate case, required, to take into account the risk to the public in a country to which a released prisoner will go, once he is released. Citations: … Continue reading Regina v Parole Board Ex Parte White: QBD 16 Dec 1994
The board was to consider all the evidence in deciding on a release, not just that of the psychiatrist. Citations: Times 10-May-1993 Statutes: Criminal Justice Act 1991 34(4)(b) Criminal Practice Updated: 09 April 2022; Ref: scu.87529
From 4 April 2005 until 3 December 2012, English law provided for the imposition of sentences of imprisonment for public protection (‘IPP’). The Court addressed the practical and legal issues resulting from the new system. Held: The decision as to whether to impose an IPP senence and whether a prisoner was ready for release on … Continue reading Sturnham, Regina (on The Application of) v The Parole Board of England and Wales and Another (No 2): SC 3 Jul 2013
