Click the case name for better results:

Regina v Harper; Regina v Sabin: CACD 12 Oct 1998

The court was right to look beyond the facts of the instant case, and at the defendant’s background history, when assessing whether it was necessary to impose an additional sentence for the protection of the public from a violent offender. Citations: Times 12-Oct-1998 Statutes: Criminal Justice Act 1991 2(2)(b) Jurisdiction: England and Wales Criminal Sentencing … Continue reading Regina v Harper; Regina v Sabin: CACD 12 Oct 1998

Regina v B (Longer Term Sentences): CACD 31 Dec 1998

A court could not, under its powers to extend a sentence, impose a sentence beyond the normal maximum, but where appropriate it could add extensions to individual sentences and if appropriate make them consecutive to achieve the same result. Citations: Times 31-Dec-1998, Gazette 03-Feb-1999 Statutes: Criminal Justice Act 1991 2(2)(b) Jurisdiction: England and Wales Criminal … Continue reading Regina v B (Longer Term Sentences): CACD 31 Dec 1998

Regina v Gabbidon, Bramble: CACD 7 Nov 1996

The defendants appealed sentences for serious, violent robberies taking place in burglaries of domestic properties, with long lasting effects on the victims. Held: The section had been correctly applied. The court reviewed authorities on sentencing for such matters. 12 years was appropriate for the robberies, with 5 years added to protect the public. Judges: Lord … Continue reading Regina v Gabbidon, Bramble: CACD 7 Nov 1996

Regina v Powell: CACD 9 Aug 1996

A Judge need not say what sentence would have been passed but for extended sentence. Citations: Times 09-Aug-1996 Statutes: Criminal Justice Act 1991 2(2)(b) Jurisdiction: England and Wales Criminal Sentencing Updated: 08 October 2022; Ref: scu.87559

Regina on the Application of Giles v Parole Board and Secretary of State for the Home Department: CA 4 Jul 2002

The prisoner had been sentenced to a punitive term, and an additional protective term under the Act. After the parole board had decided that he could be released from the punitive part of the sentence, he obtained declaration that the board should also periodically review the protective part of the sentence. Held: The protective part … Continue reading Regina on the Application of Giles v Parole Board and Secretary of State for the Home Department: CA 4 Jul 2002

Regina v Scammell: CACD 15 Nov 1996

Appeal against sentence for threats to kill and false imprisonment (six years) – Dismissed Citations: [1996] EWCA Crim 1448, [1996] EWCA Crim 1447 Statutes: Criminal Justice Act 1991 2(2)(b) Criminal Sentencing Updated: 12 April 2022; Ref: scu.149112

Regina v Everleigh: CACD 16 May 2001

Sentences extended under the section should not be imposed consecutively with other sentences imposed at the same time, though this might be possible where the other sentence had been previously imposed. Although the authorities were difficult to reconcile, there was no illogicality in imposing extended sentences consecutive to other sentences, where for example, the sentencing … Continue reading Regina v Everleigh: CACD 16 May 2001

Clingham (formerly C (a minor)) v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea; Regina v Crown Court at Manchester Ex parte McCann and Others: HL 17 Oct 2002

The applicants had been made subject of anti-social behaviour orders. They challenged the basis upon which the orders had been made. Held: The orders had no identifiable consequences which would make the process a criminal one. Civil standards of evidence therefore applied, and hearsay evidence was admissible. Nevertheless, the test as to whether it was … Continue reading Clingham (formerly C (a minor)) v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea; Regina v Crown Court at Manchester Ex parte McCann and Others: HL 17 Oct 2002