Click the case name for better results:

Regina v Cakmak; Regina v Cavcav; Regina v Talay; Regina v Can etc: CACD 8 Feb 2002

The applicants each took part in an occupation of pods on the London Eye. They appealed convictions for threatening criminal damage, alleging the judge had misdirected the jury on the necessary ingredients of the offence. Held: Section 2, as opposed to section 1, did not refer to recklessness, requiring under either sub-section, the threat that … Continue reading Regina v Cakmak; Regina v Cavcav; Regina v Talay; Regina v Can etc: CACD 8 Feb 2002