Click the case name for better results:

LM and Others v Regina; Regina v M(L), B(M) and G(D): CACD 21 Oct 2010

Each defendant appealed saying that being themselves the victims of people trafficking, the prosecutions had failed to take into account its obligations under the Convention. Held: Prosecutors had ‘a three-stage exercise of judgment. The first is: (1) is there a reason to believe that the person has been trafficked? If so, then (2) if there … Continue reading LM and Others v Regina; Regina v M(L), B(M) and G(D): CACD 21 Oct 2010

N, Regina v: CACD 20 Feb 2012

The court considered the offence of child trafficking. The defendants had been the victims of such offences and used for managing cannabis production. It was argued that neither defendant should have been prosecuted. Held: The appeals failed. The defence of duress should not be extended for a new category, that of victims of people trafficking, … Continue reading N, Regina v: CACD 20 Feb 2012