Click the case name for better results:

Regina v Ministry of Agriculture Fisheries and Food ex parte Lower Burytown Farms Limited and National Farmers Union and others: Admn 1 Aug 1995

The applicants were farmers who had claimed payments under the set-aside scheme. Payment was refused on the basis that they had claimed too much, but payment was ordered to be made after a ruling in Europe. They now sought judicial review of a refusal to pay interest on the payments withheld. The claims were wrong, … Continue reading Regina v Ministry of Agriculture Fisheries and Food ex parte Lower Burytown Farms Limited and National Farmers Union and others: Admn 1 Aug 1995

Wren v Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: QBD 14 Nov 2002

The applicant farmers sought payment under the set-aside regulations. They had harvested hay and grass in the year before relevant fields were set aside, but had been refused the relevant compensation. Held: The regulation defined ‘set-aside’ as ‘the leaving fallow of an area which has been cultivated in the previous year with a view to … Continue reading Wren v Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: QBD 14 Nov 2002

Kellinghusen v Amt fur Land- und Wasserwirtschaft Kiel (Agriculture): ECJ 22 Oct 1998

ECJ On the interpretation and validity, in Case C-36/97, of Article 15(3) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1765/92 of 30 June 1992 establishing a support system for producers of certain arable crops (OJ 1992 L 181, p. 12), and, in Case C-37/97, of Article 30a of Regulation (EEC) No 805/68 of the Council of 27 … Continue reading Kellinghusen v Amt fur Land- und Wasserwirtschaft Kiel (Agriculture): ECJ 22 Oct 1998