Click the case name for better results:

Dugmore v Swansea NHS Trust and Another: CA 21 Nov 2002

The claimant had become sensitive to latex dust while working for the first employer, then suffered an anaphylactic shock when coming into contact with the dust while employed by the second. Held: The regulations required that ‘every employer shall ensure that the exposure of his employee to a substance hazardous to health is either prevented, … Continue reading Dugmore v Swansea NHS Trust and Another: CA 21 Nov 2002

David v Honeywell Normalair-Garrett Ltd: QBD 2 Mar 2006

The claimant sought damages for personal injuries arising from exposure to depleted uranium whilst working for the defendant. An earlier claim had been compromised. The defendant denied liabilty and relied also on the compromise. Held: The evidence from expert witnesses was conflicting, but there was no sufficient evidence of exposure of the claimant to depleted … Continue reading David v Honeywell Normalair-Garrett Ltd: QBD 2 Mar 2006

Bilton v Fastnet Highlands LTd: OHCS 20 Nov 1997

It was for the defenders to say what steps they had been taken to comply with their obligations under the Regulations, not for an employee complainant to say what should happen. Citations: Times 20-Nov-1997, [1998] SLT 1323 Statutes: Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Regulations 1988 (SI 1988 No 1657) Jurisdiction: Scotland Cited by: Cited … Continue reading Bilton v Fastnet Highlands LTd: OHCS 20 Nov 1997