The restrictions imposed on trading with residents of Iraq continued to apply even if the person involved left Iraq. A simple change of address could not be allowed to be used to circumvent important international provisions. Provisions existed for assessing such residence. Even so, surprising effects might follow. In this case, the former resident would … Continue reading Shansal v Al-Kishtaini: CA 8 Mar 2001
The restrictions imposed on trading with residents of Iraq continued to apply even if the person involved left Iraq. A simple change of address could not be allowed to be used to circumvent important international provisions. Provisions existed for assessing such residence. Even so, surprising effects might follow. In this case, the former resident would … Continue reading Shansal v Al-Kishtaini: CA 26 Apr 2001
The rules preventing any trading activity with residents of Iraq ceased to apply where the person was so resident when the ban came into force but later left. A party could not rely upon the prohibition to make his contract illegal in these circumstances. Citations: Times 16-Jun-1999 Statutes: Control of Gold, Securities, Payments and Credits … Continue reading Shanshal v Al-Kishtaini: QBD 16 Jun 1999
