Monnington v Easier Plc: ChD 21 Nov 2005
Citations: [2005] EWHC 2578 (Ch) Links: Bailii Statutes: Companies Act 1985 351 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Company Updated: 27 September 2022; Ref: scu.235441
Citations: [2005] EWHC 2578 (Ch) Links: Bailii Statutes: Companies Act 1985 351 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Company Updated: 27 September 2022; Ref: scu.235441
Judges: The Honourable Mr Justice Peter Smith Citations: [2005] EWHC 1567 (Ch) Links: Bailii Statutes: Companies Act 1985 351 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Company Updated: 01 July 2022; Ref: scu.228950
The defendant company appealed in part against a finding of unfair conduct of the company as against a minority shareholder, saying the court had been wrong to treat a payment of management charges as unfairly prejudicial. Though nothing had been done to support the charges, the defendant said that the claimant must have consented in … Continue reading Wilson v Jaymarke Estates Ltd and Another: HL 20 Jun 2007
Richards J said: ‘In considering the primary position of the Opposing Bondholders, it is important to keep in mind the function of the court at this stage. This is an application by the companies for leave to convene meetings to consider the schemes. It is emphatically not a hearing to consider the merits and fairness … Continue reading In the Matter of Telewest Communications Plc and in the Matter of Telewest Finance (Jersey) Ltd: ChD 22 Jun 2004
The Referendum Party challenged the allocation to it of less time for election broadcasts. Under the existing agreements, having fielded over 50 candidates, they were allocated only five minutes. Held: Neither the inclusion of past electoral support as part of their general criteria for allocating party election broadcasts nor their treatment of the lack of … Continue reading Regina v British Broadcasting Corporation, ex parte Referendum Party; Regina v Independent Television Commission, ex parte Referendum Party: Admn 24 Apr 1997
The parties disputed the validity of the appointment of a receiver. The ostensible ground for appointment of the receiver was not made out, but the bank relied on a new ground, section 223(d) of the 1948 Act. Nicholls LJ observed: ‘Construing this section first without reference to authority, it seems to me plain that, in … Continue reading Byblos Bank SAL v Al-Khudhairy: CA 1987