The court applied a wide interpretation of the word ‘instructions’ where the Rules exempted such instruction to experts preparing a report. Judges: Hart J Citations: Unreported, 15-Jan-2001 Statutes: Civil Procedure Rules 35.10 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: Doubted – Lucas v Barking, Havering and Redbridge Hospitals NHS Trust CA 23-Jul-2003 The claimant appealed an … Continue reading Morris v Bank of India: ChD 15 Jan 2001
The court construed narrowly the term ‘instructions’ within the rules where they exempted document forming part of the instructions to an expert to prepare a report for the litigation from disclosure. The word meant ‘what an expert was told to do’. Judges: Moreland J Citations: Unreported, 14-Jan-2000 Statutes: Civil Procedure Rules 35.10 Jurisdiction: England and … Continue reading Taylor v Bolton Heath Health Authority: QBD 14 Jan 2000
The claimant appealed an order requiring him to disclose to the defendants the terms of the instructions given to the expert witness. Held: Rule 35.10(4) restriction applied to prevent the defendant from obtaining an order for the inspection he sought. Judges: Waller, Mantell, Laws LJJ Citations: [2003] EWCA Civ 1102, Times 28-Aug-2003, Gazette 02-Oct-2003, [2004] … Continue reading Lucas v Barking, Havering and Redbridge Hospitals NHS Trust: CA 23 Jul 2003
