The court had to decide to which of two local authorities, responsibility for supervising a care order should be assigned. The child had moved to live with his grandparents. Held: The judge had been correct to find that family circumstances might justify not following the rules in Northamptonshire and Plymouth, but the case was not … Continue reading H (Child), Re (Care Order: Appropriate Local Authority): CA 18 Nov 2003

Where a child coming into care had had connection with two local authorities beforehand, the primary statutory responsibility for care would be determined by assessing which was the authority with a connection to the child immediately before the period to be disregarded under the Act for any temporary placement. The court reaffirmed the simple test … Continue reading Plymouth City Council v C and Another: CA 21 Mar 2000

Beldam, Pill, Thorpe LJJ [1999] EWCA Civ 3031, [1999] 2 FLR 881, [2000] LGR 125, [1999] Fam Law 687, [2000] BLGR 125, [2001] Fam 364, [2000] 2 WLR 193, [1999] 3 FCR 385 Bailii Children Act 1989 31(8) 105(6) England and Wales Children, Local Government Updated: 03 December 2021; Ref: scu.346266

A local authority which permitted children in care to remain at home with their mother was not providing accommodation within the meaning of section 23(1)(a) of the Children Act 1989 and accordingly section 105(6)(c) did not apply. The court . .