Citations: [2008] EWCA Civ 417 Links: Bailii Statutes: Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Judicial Review, Animals Updated: 20 December 2022; Ref: scu.267042
Judges: Mitting J Citations: [2007] EWHC 1964 (Admin) Links: Bailii Statutes: Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Animals Updated: 05 December 2022; Ref: scu.258804
Judges: Bean J Citations: [2006] EWHC 250 (Admin) Links: Bailii Statutes: Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Costs Updated: 24 July 2022; Ref: scu.238765
Judges: Eady J Citations: [2008] EWHC 892 (QB) Links: Bailii Statutes: Freedom of Information Act 2000, Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 24 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: Appeal from – British Union for the Abolition of Vivisection v Home Office and Another CA 30-Jul-2008 The union sought disclosure of information supplied to the respondent … Continue reading Secretary of State for the Home Office v British Union for the Abolition of Vivisection and Another: QBD 25 Apr 2008
Application for judicial review of the respondent’s administration of the Act. Citations: [2005] EWHC 530 (Admin) Links: Bailii Statutes: Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Administrative Updated: 07 May 2022; Ref: scu.224123
Collins J [2016] EWHC 1644 (Admin) Bailii Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 England and Wales Animals Updated: 24 January 2022; Ref: scu.570535
The claimant challenged licensing arrangements for experimentation on animals under the 1986 Act. Andrews DBE J [2015] EWHC 3631 (Admin) Bailii Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 England and Wales Animals Updated: 08 January 2022; Ref: scu.557141
The union sought disclosure of information supplied to the respondent when the applicant applied for licences to carry out animal experiments.
Held: The information had been supplied in confidence. The test was a subjective one as to the state . .
The claimant company was licensed to carry out scientific research, including research on live animals. The defendant association and its members opposed such work as cruel. The claimant had obtained an injunction to restrain the defendants harrassing protests. They now sought additional orders to protect staff members. Held: The order had provided a structure within … Continue reading Huntingdon Life Sciences Group Plc and Another v Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty (SHAC): QBD 15 Mar 2007