W v W (Child of the Family): 3 Nov 1984
M sought to establish that the defendant was the father of her child. Her complaint being out of time, she had to rely upon section 2(1)(b) to establish responsibility. The putative father had not given her money for maintenance but had contributed to the cost of a pram, and had given trousers and a jumper … Continue reading W v W (Child of the Family): 3 Nov 1984