Everett v Islington Guardians: 1923
The court was asked whether a jury trial was appropriate under the 1920 Act. Held: Avery J said: ‘It cannot be sufficient to bring a case within those words of the proviso that a plaintiff should merely allege in his particulars that the defendant has acted fraudulently. Suppose an action is brought for the price … Continue reading Everett v Islington Guardians: 1923