[1738] EngR 472, (1688-1710, 1738) Holt KB 17, (1738) 90 ER 907
Commonlii
England and Wales
Citing:
See Also – Keeble v Hickeringill 1796
. .
Cited by:
See Also – Keeble v Hickeringall 1738
Holt CJ, delivered the opinion of the Court for the plaintiff, and said, that this is a new action, but is supported by the old reason and principles of law ; taking of wild-fowl is a lawful and profitable employment, it is as if it were his trade . .
See Also – Keeble v Hickeringall (470) 1738
. .
See Also – Keeble v Hickeringhall 1795
Case lies where the plaintiff had a possession without any property. Case in which the plaintiff declared, that he was possessed of a decoy pond frequented with ducks, of which he made great gains, and that the defendant knowing and maliciously . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Torts – Other, Animals
Updated: 05 January 2022; Ref: scu.385865