The claimant, a Chinese national, came here lawfully as a student in 2005. She obtained an extension conditional on not working more than 20 hours a week. She was found to be working full time. She objected to removal on Article 8 grouds. The Secretary of State appealed against a rejection of his certificate that the Article 8 claim was unfounded.
Held: Even assuming that a removal might interfere with her article 8 rights, it was manifestly lawful.
Lord Justice Sedley, Lady Justice Arden and Lord Justice Rimer
[2009] EWCA Civ 680, Times 20-Oct-2009
Bailii
European Convention on Human Rights 8
England and Wales
Updated: 14 August 2021; Ref: scu.347471