Cetelem Sa v Roust Holdings Ltd: QBD 29 Dec 2004

Choses in action including contractual rights are ‘assets’ within the meaning of section 44(3).

Citations:

[2004] EWHC 3175 (QB), [2005] 2 Lloyds Rep 494

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

Arbitration Act 1996 44(3)

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Cited by:

Appeal from – Cetelem Sa v Roust Holdings Ltd CA 24-May-2005
The parties were engaged in arbitration proceedings. The claimant had sought and obtained an interim mandatory order intended to prevent the defendant dissipating its assets in anticipation of an adverse ruling. The defendant sought leave to appeal. . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Arbitration

Updated: 12 November 2022; Ref: scu.467231