The defendants sought directions to restrict the issues in the forthcoming defamation action.
Held: Orders were considered and made accordingly.
Judges:
Eady J
Citations:
[2011] EWHC 1468 (QB)
Links:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Citing:
Cited – Expandable Ltd and Another v Rubin CA 11-Feb-2008
The defendant’s witness statement referred to a letter written to him by the defendant’s solicitor. The claimant appealed refusal of an order for its disclosure.
Held: The appeal failed. The letter was protected by legal professional . .
Cited – Clarke (T/A Elumina Iberica Uk) v Bain and Another QBD 19-Nov-2008
The defendant asked the court to dismiss claims in defamation in an email saying that it lacked jurisdiction: ‘what is to be found on the internet may become like a tattoo’
Held: The court emphasised the need for careful control by the court . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Defamation, Litigation Practice
Updated: 23 August 2022; Ref: scu.440577