The applicant appealed a finding that his dismissal had not been unfair. On applying for the post he had exaggerated his qualifications, and would not have been appointed without them. He asserted that the chairman of the tribunal had been biased against him in the excessive interruptions which had intimidated his witnesses. The test of bias was whether a fair-minded and informed observer might conclude there was a real possibility that the tribunal was biased. The true nature of the claimant’s claim had only become clear as the hearing had progressed. He had been heard over four days, and could not be said to have had his opportunity to present his case restricted. Despite faults, a fair minded observer would not conclude there was any bias in the chairman.
Citations:
EAT/1193/00, [2001] UKEAT 1193 – 00 – 1403
Links:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Employment
Updated: 26 July 2022; Ref: scu.203602