Evidence in an action by an individual burgess for interdict against interfering with certain lands belonging to the burgh, upon which held ( rev. unanimous judgment of the First Division, which had affirmed the interlocutor of the Lord Ordinary, Kincairney) that the complainer had failed to prove that the piece of ground in question had from time immemorial been appropriated to the use and enjoyment of the
Judges:
Lord Chancellor (Halsbury), Lord Shand, Lord Davey, Lord Robertson, and Lord Lindley
Citations:
[1903] UKHL 137, 41 SLR 137
Links:
Jurisdiction:
Scotland
Land
Updated: 13 June 2022; Ref: scu.630585