Defendants appealed orders made under the 2003 Act.
Held: The 2003 Act required supplementary procedural provisions in order to work. Those provisions had not been isued, and this risked, amongst other things, the wast eof judicial resources. This case wouldhave to be adjourned. The position at the moment was obscure to the point of being chaotic.
Judges:
Rose LJ, Jrobes J, Calvert-Smith J
Citations:
Times 25-Jul-2005
Statutes:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Criminal Practice
Updated: 07 May 2022; Ref: scu.229651