Muhammed v Regina: CACD 19 Feb 2010

The defendant appealed against his conviction for possessing an article for a purpose connected with terrorism and making a record of information likely to be useful in terrorism. He now appealed against the latter conviction. He had been found to have very large quantities of such electronic materials.
Held: The appeal failed. The definition of such material had not been too wide. However the appeal against sentence succeeded.

Judges:

Hooper LJ, Wyn Williams J, Warwick McKinnon HHJ

Citations:

[2010] EWCA Crim 227, [2010] 3 All ER 759

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

Terrorism Act 2000

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Crime, Criminal Sentencing

Updated: 14 August 2022; Ref: scu.401803