Malik and Another v Bank of Credit and Commerce International Sa: Chd 23 Feb 1994

A stigma arising from an association with a notorious employer gave rise to no cause of action.

Citations:

Ind Summary 21-Mar-1994, Times 23-Feb-1994

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Cited by:

At First InstanceMalik v Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI); Mahmud v Bank of Credit and Commerce International HL 12-Jun-1997
Allowance of Stigma Damages
The employees claimed damages, saying that the way in which their employer had behaved during their employment had led to continuing losses, ‘stigma damages’ after the termination.
Held: It is an implied term of any contract of employment that . .
Appeal fromMalik and Another v Bank of Credit and Commerce International Sa CA 17-Mar-1995
No compensation was payable for a stigma of innocent workers having worked for a fraudulent bank. . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Employment, Damages

Updated: 09 April 2022; Ref: scu.83351